I have now spent three entire days, from 11am until 9-10pm, marauding the outside courts at Melbourne Park watching an absurd amount of tennis. 'Does it not get boring?' I hear you ask. Quite simply, no it doesn't, each match is unique and entertaining in its own way. One variable is the crowd, with a standout aspect of the tournament being the hearty support many players receive from their countrymen.
The Israeli support was a well coordinated unit, the Japanese fans outnumbered the Australians for Kei Nishikori's clash with Marinko Matosevic, six Poles chanted at the volume of sixty after each point Jerzy Janowicz played (win or lose), and French cries of 'Allez!' helped Gilles Simon miraculously save seven match points to overcome German Daniel Brands in an epic 16-14 fifth set.
However, none of the above came close to the madness of the Bosnians. Their hero, 21 year old qualifier Damir Dzumhur, became the first Bosnian to win a Grand Slam match on Monday and today he faced Croatian Ivan Dodig in front of around thirty crazy Bosnian fans. After losing the first two sets, Dzumhur took the third and at this point Dodig took a bathroom break. The flag-traipsing Bosnians sung throughout every second of this five or so minute break, with the euphoria culminating in the entire group linking arms and jumping up and down in a circle. I had never seen anything like it at a tennis match before, it was like a football crowd. The rowdiness continued and soon after Dodig was forced to retire with leg cramps, sending Dzumhur through to the round of 32. I would be surprised if Bosnian independence was met with more jubilation than this victory.
By Wednesday afternoon I was itching for someone to lend my own support to. Given the usual dearth of Brits, I chose to get behind the Finn Jarkko Nieminen in his encounter with the flashy Italian Fabio Fognini. It wasn't as random a choice as you might think. I have a soft spot for the Scandinavian nation due to my Finnish buddy Liinus and I was with my Swedish friend Markus, who wanted to root for his neighbour. Furthermore, Nieminen is the kind of player I can get behind. The 32 year old is an unremarkable guy who has done remarkably well. He doesn't appear to be terrifically athletic and his play isn't exactly dazzling. However, Jarkko maximises his ability and has been in the Top 50 for the majority of the past 10 years. Furthermore, I am reliably informed that Jarkko is widely regarded as the nicest guy on tour.
The Finnish support on Court 3 consisted of four sections, which were, in order of size:
- Seven or eight flag bearers sat at the opposite end to me.
- Three or four corner seated fans who were mostly quiet, but suddenly and randomly burst out with songs of "Let's go Jarkko".
- Myself and Markus, who sat in the front row behind the court and provided consistent encouragement.
- A backwards-capped old man who proudly waved his small flag and occasionally bellowed something out, such as the titular chant.
Opposing us were around five to ten typically shirtless Italians. These bros weren't the rowdiest, but did have to be restrained from shouting out 'bravo' during the point by the umpire.
The match was a strange one. For a Grand Slam second round the standard was poor and the players were more poking sticks at each other than swinging swords. Nieminen looked fatigued from his five set marathon on Monday while Fognini was awfully erratic - at times he displayed why he's climbed into the Top 20 and at other times he was hopeless. Nieminen snuck into an early 3-0 lead, but was immediately pegged back and went on to drop the set 7-5. The second set was equally frustrating - 6-4 Fognini - but in the third Jarkko upped his game and took it 6-3. At the start of the fourth set, the Italian had really lost his way, missing balls left and right, grumbling to his coaches, and picking up a warning for firing a ball into the back fence. All four sections of the Finnish support began to believe and upped their volume accordingly. But then there was another twist, Nieminen was 40-0 up on his serve and inexplicably fell apart, losing the next nine points to go 4-1 down. Fognini sniffed victory and pounced, taking the set 6-2.
Overall the Finns weren't the loudest but they were very supportive, sticking with their player every step of the way and even singing his name after the match was over. Meanwhile, the victory aroused the Italians, who broke into football style singing that persisted until they were eventually rewarded by Fognini flinging them one of his sweaty towels.
My support wasn't enough to get Jarkko Nieminen past Fabio Fognini
Wednesday, 15 January 2014
Tuesday, 14 January 2014
Australian Open vs Wimbledon
How does the Australian Open viewing experience compare to that at Wimbledon? In this post I will explore some of the differences, focusing on being a ground pass holder rather than a stadium court viewer, as that I have a ground pass here and in my opinion it is the the best way to enjoy the tennis.
- Getting tickets. Wimbledon is notoriously difficult to get tickets for. Those wanting show court seats have to get lucky in a ballot or camp overnight, while those willing to queue for hours in the morning are rewarded with ground passes. In contrast, any Australian Open ticket can simply be purchased online or even on the day. I collected my 5 day ground pass ($125 / £69) on Monday and now I can casually stroll in each day.
- Crowd size. Wimbledon, outside courts, first four days, it is rammed. When the gates open in the morning, people run to their chosen court like they are starting a 5k, only with more picnics. Once play gets under way try making your way between Courts Four and Five - you won't be able to, it's like trying to walk to the front of the Pyramid Stage during a headline act. A grindfest between two Spanish journeymen who would rather eat grass than play tennis on it will cause spectators to clamber on pot plants to get a view over the crowds. It is a different story at Melbourne Park, where the outside courts can be as barren as some of the country's landscape. I watched the popular Grigor Dimitrov this morning and one side was almost empty. The difference can probably be attributed to two main factors. Most importantly, Wimbledon simply has a far more populous catchment area. There must be 40 million or so living within four hours of London, whereas that number for Melbourne is less than three. Secondly, the Australian heat can make sitting in the sun watching tennis a daunting prospect. On this note, I really think the Australian Open could do a lot better at providing shade for its spectators. Some simple canvasses covering at least part of the stands would make a massive difference and surely wouldn't be too costly. Tiny sections of Courts 2 and 3 are covered, but frustratingly by this blue mesh that doesn't really block the sun.
- Idiots. You'll have to forgive me for being rude and snobby for a moment when I say that both Slams are plagued by fools who know nothing about tennis. On countless times at Wimbledon I've come across spectators who have no idea how tennis scoring works. To be fair, it is harsh to criticize someone for their lack of tennis knowledge - they just haven't been fortunate enough to learn and hopefully after a day watching the pros they'll go on to become a fan - but some people are just idiots. On Monday a large number of punters starting weaving through the crowd for seats at 4-4 30-15 without caring about disrupting the game. On Court 9 a couple of ladies exclaimed "that's Del Potro! Yep, definitely him!" It was actually world number 98 Leonardo Mayer. You can be forgiven for not knowing exactly what Del Potro looks like and Mayer does resemble him in both appearance and technique, but surely you would wonder why the world number five has been stuck on a random outside court? And why there is barely anyone watching his battle with Albert Montanes? And what about looking at the scoreboard?
- Courts. The Australian Open offers more options for the ground pass holder - only two courts are reserved seat compared to three and a half at Wimbledon - but Wimbledon has more variety. There is the hollowed out circle arena of Court 3, the close-to-the-action benches of Courts 4-11, the shaded side stand of Court 12, the 'stop to watch a little as you pass' nature of Court 14, and my favourite - Court 18 - which is surrounded by spectators from all angles and heights. In contrast, here at the Aussie Open, there are simply three circle arenas and two groups of courts with stands of varying height on on the sides. There is certainly nothing with the charisma of Court 18.
- The Umpire's Chair. You may think I'm nitpicking, but the umpire's chair plays a large role in spectating tennis. On the same side as it, the chair can block a significant portion of the view, so its probably best to make it as small and transparent as possible, right? Wimbledon know the score, plumping for a traditional wooden number with a few gaps to see through. However, at the Australian Open the umpire sits atop a ridiculous structure, it is entirely opaque, about twice as wide as it needs to be, and may have once been a disused Star Wars prop.
- Atmosphere. If you're thinking that Wimbledon wins this category then you're spot on. Melbourne Park just cannot compete with the tradition, history, and magic that surrounds SW19. The grass, the green Slazenger awnings, the ivy growing up Centre Court...Melbourne Park boasts great city skyline backdrops but just doesn't have the same vibe. There is also nothing at the Australian Open to rival Henman Hill. Its best attempt is the beer garden pictured below (which also features live bands), but both the screen and atmosphere are far smaller - I was briefly there for the end of a Hewitt five setter and it was eerily quiet compared to The Hill.
The Verdict: I don't want to say one Slam is better than the other. For ease of watching tennis, the Australian Open comes up trumps, but for atmosphere it's Wimby all the way.
- Getting tickets. Wimbledon is notoriously difficult to get tickets for. Those wanting show court seats have to get lucky in a ballot or camp overnight, while those willing to queue for hours in the morning are rewarded with ground passes. In contrast, any Australian Open ticket can simply be purchased online or even on the day. I collected my 5 day ground pass ($125 / £69) on Monday and now I can casually stroll in each day.
- Crowd size. Wimbledon, outside courts, first four days, it is rammed. When the gates open in the morning, people run to their chosen court like they are starting a 5k, only with more picnics. Once play gets under way try making your way between Courts Four and Five - you won't be able to, it's like trying to walk to the front of the Pyramid Stage during a headline act. A grindfest between two Spanish journeymen who would rather eat grass than play tennis on it will cause spectators to clamber on pot plants to get a view over the crowds. It is a different story at Melbourne Park, where the outside courts can be as barren as some of the country's landscape. I watched the popular Grigor Dimitrov this morning and one side was almost empty. The difference can probably be attributed to two main factors. Most importantly, Wimbledon simply has a far more populous catchment area. There must be 40 million or so living within four hours of London, whereas that number for Melbourne is less than three. Secondly, the Australian heat can make sitting in the sun watching tennis a daunting prospect. On this note, I really think the Australian Open could do a lot better at providing shade for its spectators. Some simple canvasses covering at least part of the stands would make a massive difference and surely wouldn't be too costly. Tiny sections of Courts 2 and 3 are covered, but frustratingly by this blue mesh that doesn't really block the sun.
| Am I in the shade or not? It was hard to tell under this blue mesh. Also note the empty seats. |
- Idiots. You'll have to forgive me for being rude and snobby for a moment when I say that both Slams are plagued by fools who know nothing about tennis. On countless times at Wimbledon I've come across spectators who have no idea how tennis scoring works. To be fair, it is harsh to criticize someone for their lack of tennis knowledge - they just haven't been fortunate enough to learn and hopefully after a day watching the pros they'll go on to become a fan - but some people are just idiots. On Monday a large number of punters starting weaving through the crowd for seats at 4-4 30-15 without caring about disrupting the game. On Court 9 a couple of ladies exclaimed "that's Del Potro! Yep, definitely him!" It was actually world number 98 Leonardo Mayer. You can be forgiven for not knowing exactly what Del Potro looks like and Mayer does resemble him in both appearance and technique, but surely you would wonder why the world number five has been stuck on a random outside court? And why there is barely anyone watching his battle with Albert Montanes? And what about looking at the scoreboard?
- Courts. The Australian Open offers more options for the ground pass holder - only two courts are reserved seat compared to three and a half at Wimbledon - but Wimbledon has more variety. There is the hollowed out circle arena of Court 3, the close-to-the-action benches of Courts 4-11, the shaded side stand of Court 12, the 'stop to watch a little as you pass' nature of Court 14, and my favourite - Court 18 - which is surrounded by spectators from all angles and heights. In contrast, here at the Aussie Open, there are simply three circle arenas and two groups of courts with stands of varying height on on the sides. There is certainly nothing with the charisma of Court 18.
- The Umpire's Chair. You may think I'm nitpicking, but the umpire's chair plays a large role in spectating tennis. On the same side as it, the chair can block a significant portion of the view, so its probably best to make it as small and transparent as possible, right? Wimbledon know the score, plumping for a traditional wooden number with a few gaps to see through. However, at the Australian Open the umpire sits atop a ridiculous structure, it is entirely opaque, about twice as wide as it needs to be, and may have once been a disused Star Wars prop.
| Could that umpire's chair have been designed more thoughtfully? I'll let you be the judge. |
- Atmosphere. If you're thinking that Wimbledon wins this category then you're spot on. Melbourne Park just cannot compete with the tradition, history, and magic that surrounds SW19. The grass, the green Slazenger awnings, the ivy growing up Centre Court...Melbourne Park boasts great city skyline backdrops but just doesn't have the same vibe. There is also nothing at the Australian Open to rival Henman Hill. Its best attempt is the beer garden pictured below (which also features live bands), but both the screen and atmosphere are far smaller - I was briefly there for the end of a Hewitt five setter and it was eerily quiet compared to The Hill.
| The Heineken logo being bigger than the screen tells its own story. |
The Verdict: I don't want to say one Slam is better than the other. For ease of watching tennis, the Australian Open comes up trumps, but for atmosphere it's Wimby all the way.
Monday, 13 January 2014
Australian Open Day 1: Fifth Set Fever
I awoke feeling full of life this morning. The sun was shining on Melbourne and after a lengthy sleep I had finally recovered from the double whammy of the final Cronulla night out followed by the through the night bus journey. But most importantly, it was the first day of the Australian Open and I was more excited than a small kid who had just discovered that a faulty vending machine was offering him favourable deals on Mars bars. Today was the first of five consecutive days I'll be spending at Melbourne Park and I plan on blogging about each of them, so if you have no interest in tennis you may want to tune back in next week.
Up first was American Steve Johnson versus left-handed Frenchman Adrian Mannarino. I picked it out for two reasons. Firstly, Johnson was the number one college player while I was at university, ending his college career with a legendary 72 match winning streak, so I wanted to check his game out. Secondly, the matchup offered an interesting clash in styles and I fancied it to go to five sets. Johnson is an attacking player who crushes serves, bludgeons forehands, and knifes slice backhands. Whereas Mannarino is one of those players who makes you want to pick up a racket and give tennis another go, as he is slender and doesn't seem to have anything special at all. However, he plays the angles brilliantly and once he got to grips with the Johnson onslaught he rarely made mistakes. It was Johnson who raced into a lead and at 11.49am Mannarino's racket became probably the first of the tournament to be smashed. But at 6-3 3-1 up the American went the way of Mannarino's racket - to pieces. He served double fault after double fault, his forehand radar went haywire, and he lost the next eleven games to trail by two sets to one. Thankfully Johnson pulled it together and managed to draw the match level after a very entertaining fourth set. The first match, a five setter! Fantastic! Unfortunately Johnson's double faults returned for an encore at 3-3, the three he threw in during that game cost him his serve and consequently the match - one break was enough for the Frenchman to take the final set 6-4.
I immediately rushed to another fifth set, being contested by Finn Jarkko Nieminen and Israeli Dudi Sela. The atmosphere on Court 7 was raucous. A squadron of Israelis chanted after every point Sela won, including the genius "backhand down the line, backhand backhand down the line" after such a winner. They were opposed by a knot of jolly Swedes, who had adopted the neighboring Nieminen during their current drought of players. Joining this support was my friend Markus, a Swedish traveler I met in Cronulla who joined me for most of the day and enjoyed Nieminen's epic win.
These first two matches provided a brilliant start to the day and the rest was great too: Fabio Fognini impressed, the unheralded world number 63 Pablo Carreno Busta fought hard but went down in another five setter to the experienced Julien Benneteau, and in the evening Alexandr 'The Dog' Dolgopolov played the best tennis I saw all day. I truly had fifth set fever by the end of the day, as I concluding it by watching my fourth deciding set - Nikolay Davydenko edging net-rushing Lukasz Kubot under the lights, much to the dismay of five rowdy Polish fans.
The major talking point of the day was the heat. Well over 30 degrees Celsius, perfectly sunny and lacking in breeze, it stifled players and spectators alike. Players maximised time between points and the matches regularly became wars of attrition lacking in quality. The most notable consequence of the scorching weather was the far greater than usual number of double faults served. Playing tennis in the heat is both a mental and physical challenge, and lapses in concentration as well as a lack of drive from the body could be held responsible for the large number of double faults thrown in. As for myself, I got through the day by drinking about six litres of water and lathering myself in SPF 50 sunscreen. Tomorrow the heatwave will really kick in - it is forecast to be over 40 degrees and if I survive I'll be back with another blog post.
Up first was American Steve Johnson versus left-handed Frenchman Adrian Mannarino. I picked it out for two reasons. Firstly, Johnson was the number one college player while I was at university, ending his college career with a legendary 72 match winning streak, so I wanted to check his game out. Secondly, the matchup offered an interesting clash in styles and I fancied it to go to five sets. Johnson is an attacking player who crushes serves, bludgeons forehands, and knifes slice backhands. Whereas Mannarino is one of those players who makes you want to pick up a racket and give tennis another go, as he is slender and doesn't seem to have anything special at all. However, he plays the angles brilliantly and once he got to grips with the Johnson onslaught he rarely made mistakes. It was Johnson who raced into a lead and at 11.49am Mannarino's racket became probably the first of the tournament to be smashed. But at 6-3 3-1 up the American went the way of Mannarino's racket - to pieces. He served double fault after double fault, his forehand radar went haywire, and he lost the next eleven games to trail by two sets to one. Thankfully Johnson pulled it together and managed to draw the match level after a very entertaining fourth set. The first match, a five setter! Fantastic! Unfortunately Johnson's double faults returned for an encore at 3-3, the three he threw in during that game cost him his serve and consequently the match - one break was enough for the Frenchman to take the final set 6-4.
I immediately rushed to another fifth set, being contested by Finn Jarkko Nieminen and Israeli Dudi Sela. The atmosphere on Court 7 was raucous. A squadron of Israelis chanted after every point Sela won, including the genius "backhand down the line, backhand backhand down the line" after such a winner. They were opposed by a knot of jolly Swedes, who had adopted the neighboring Nieminen during their current drought of players. Joining this support was my friend Markus, a Swedish traveler I met in Cronulla who joined me for most of the day and enjoyed Nieminen's epic win.
These first two matches provided a brilliant start to the day and the rest was great too: Fabio Fognini impressed, the unheralded world number 63 Pablo Carreno Busta fought hard but went down in another five setter to the experienced Julien Benneteau, and in the evening Alexandr 'The Dog' Dolgopolov played the best tennis I saw all day. I truly had fifth set fever by the end of the day, as I concluding it by watching my fourth deciding set - Nikolay Davydenko edging net-rushing Lukasz Kubot under the lights, much to the dismay of five rowdy Polish fans.
The major talking point of the day was the heat. Well over 30 degrees Celsius, perfectly sunny and lacking in breeze, it stifled players and spectators alike. Players maximised time between points and the matches regularly became wars of attrition lacking in quality. The most notable consequence of the scorching weather was the far greater than usual number of double faults served. Playing tennis in the heat is both a mental and physical challenge, and lapses in concentration as well as a lack of drive from the body could be held responsible for the large number of double faults thrown in. As for myself, I got through the day by drinking about six litres of water and lathering myself in SPF 50 sunscreen. Tomorrow the heatwave will really kick in - it is forecast to be over 40 degrees and if I survive I'll be back with another blog post.
| Steve Johnson in first round action at the Australian Open |
Saturday, 11 January 2014
Moving On
After 34 days and almost as many 30 cent McDonald's ice creams, it was time to leave Cronulla. It was a great time and I could have happily stayed longer, but I had already spent a fifth of my Australian days here, so I needed to move on to maximise the adventure factor.
On Sunday I will be arriving in Melbourne to watch The Australian Open, and as I braced myself for the 12 hour through-the-night bus journey I thought about how good Cronulla had been to me:
First and foremost, it had been fun, largely thanks to the crowd at the Cronulla Beach YHA hostel. My fellow backpackers were friendly and lively, and I will look back fondly on drinking goon with them in the kitchen. From a physical standpoint, my Cronulla days were mighty. My labour jobs more often than not doubled up as a long workout and I left stronger than I was a month ago. I had also been on several glorious seaside runs and spent a considerable amount of time unwinding with an evening (and sometimes night) stretch on the beach. Although often exhausting, Cronulla had also been a great place to relax, with many hours whiled away perched on sea view benches with a book and some sunny tunes. As a solo traveller, I had been a little concerned about Christmas and New Year's being lonely affairs, but Cronulla had delivered with its Christmas feast and by providing a base from which to experience the Sydney fireworks. Finally, and crucially, Cronulla had been kind to me financially. I had worked bloody hard and my wages combined with disciplined spending ensured that I left around $1,300 (£700) richer than when I arrived in Australia. Not bad!
Coming soon on Putting the Ali in Australia:
- I will be overdosing on tennis by attending the first five days of the Australian Open.
- I will be spending a week and celebrating Australia Day with an Australian family in the town of Bendigo.
- I will be getting to grips with 200 cows during a stay at a farm in Northern Victoria.
Stay tuned!
On Sunday I will be arriving in Melbourne to watch The Australian Open, and as I braced myself for the 12 hour through-the-night bus journey I thought about how good Cronulla had been to me:
First and foremost, it had been fun, largely thanks to the crowd at the Cronulla Beach YHA hostel. My fellow backpackers were friendly and lively, and I will look back fondly on drinking goon with them in the kitchen. From a physical standpoint, my Cronulla days were mighty. My labour jobs more often than not doubled up as a long workout and I left stronger than I was a month ago. I had also been on several glorious seaside runs and spent a considerable amount of time unwinding with an evening (and sometimes night) stretch on the beach. Although often exhausting, Cronulla had also been a great place to relax, with many hours whiled away perched on sea view benches with a book and some sunny tunes. As a solo traveller, I had been a little concerned about Christmas and New Year's being lonely affairs, but Cronulla had delivered with its Christmas feast and by providing a base from which to experience the Sydney fireworks. Finally, and crucially, Cronulla had been kind to me financially. I had worked bloody hard and my wages combined with disciplined spending ensured that I left around $1,300 (£700) richer than when I arrived in Australia. Not bad!
| A brilliant hostel. |
Coming soon on Putting the Ali in Australia:
- I will be overdosing on tennis by attending the first five days of the Australian Open.
- I will be spending a week and celebrating Australia Day with an Australian family in the town of Bendigo.
- I will be getting to grips with 200 cows during a stay at a farm in Northern Victoria.
Stay tuned!
Wednesday, 8 January 2014
The Ashes
There had already been a few 'can't believe I'm actually here' moments on this trip - the Sydney Opera House first coming into view, New Year's Eve fireworks - but nothing that compared to how astonishing it felt on Sunday to be at the Sydney Cricket Ground for an Ashes Test. I followed all nine 2013 Ashes Tests closely, so to watch the third (and final) day of the fifth test live was just amazing.
I bought the cheapest ticket at the reasonable price of $60 (just over £30) so I expected to be sitting up in the stratosphere with the ball a tiny pixel. But I had lucked out and found myself just twelve rows from the front, behind long-off. It was a fantastic seat. 42,000 were packed into the SCG (the majority wearing pink for Jane McGrath day) and the atmosphere was great - every wicket was greeted with uproar and the Barmy Army sung admirably considering the summer they'd had.
I was also in good spirits despite England's pathetic tour. Australia were already leading by over 300 runs going into Sunday so the result was effectively decided already. This meant I could set aside my England allegiance and just enjoy the cricket. And what entertaining cricket it was! 14 wickets, 302 runs, the end of the match, and an abundance of memorable moments: Chris Rogers' century, an acrobatic catch by George Bailey, Michael Carberry's bat snapping like a weak piece of cardboard, a trademark England batting collapse which saw four wickets fall in the first two overs after tea, and explosive going-down-swinging knocks from Stokes and Broad.
A peculiarity about watching cricket live is that the game is about tiny details - a faint knick, a hint of swing - that can't possibly be seen from outside the boundary. This was where the radio commentary came in. At $20, the portable radio device was dreadfully expensive considering how little it would cost to make, but it was certainly worth buying and greatly enhanced my enjoyment of the day, especially as I was unaccompanied. The commentary was a lot like Test Match Special, although not quite as charismatic it did feature TMS stalwart Johnathan Agnew. After spending so much time listening to cricket on the radio over the past six months, sitting just behind the ropes under the sweet Australia sun with the sound of Aggers' quintessentially cricketing voice in my left ear was just fantastic. I witnessed England get whitewashed, but it will surely rank among the best days of my adventure.
I bought the cheapest ticket at the reasonable price of $60 (just over £30) so I expected to be sitting up in the stratosphere with the ball a tiny pixel. But I had lucked out and found myself just twelve rows from the front, behind long-off. It was a fantastic seat. 42,000 were packed into the SCG (the majority wearing pink for Jane McGrath day) and the atmosphere was great - every wicket was greeted with uproar and the Barmy Army sung admirably considering the summer they'd had.
I was also in good spirits despite England's pathetic tour. Australia were already leading by over 300 runs going into Sunday so the result was effectively decided already. This meant I could set aside my England allegiance and just enjoy the cricket. And what entertaining cricket it was! 14 wickets, 302 runs, the end of the match, and an abundance of memorable moments: Chris Rogers' century, an acrobatic catch by George Bailey, Michael Carberry's bat snapping like a weak piece of cardboard, a trademark England batting collapse which saw four wickets fall in the first two overs after tea, and explosive going-down-swinging knocks from Stokes and Broad.
A peculiarity about watching cricket live is that the game is about tiny details - a faint knick, a hint of swing - that can't possibly be seen from outside the boundary. This was where the radio commentary came in. At $20, the portable radio device was dreadfully expensive considering how little it would cost to make, but it was certainly worth buying and greatly enhanced my enjoyment of the day, especially as I was unaccompanied. The commentary was a lot like Test Match Special, although not quite as charismatic it did feature TMS stalwart Johnathan Agnew. After spending so much time listening to cricket on the radio over the past six months, sitting just behind the ropes under the sweet Australia sun with the sound of Aggers' quintessentially cricketing voice in my left ear was just fantastic. I witnessed England get whitewashed, but it will surely rank among the best days of my adventure.
| A great view at the SCG |
Sunday, 5 January 2014
The Craziest Boss I Will Ever Work For
A New Year and another new job for me, this time for a lawn mowing/hedge trimming business. I had met some great characters in my previous four jobs, but nothing that compared to the eccentricity of my new boss:
- He could talk the hind legs off a donkey, and then back on again. His chatter is relentless - to me, to customers, to friends, to strangers, and even, on occasion, himself.
- If he had a swear jar, it would need to be the size of the Millenium Dome. The man has an acid tongue. The F word is easily his most used word, despite the fact that he ends almost every sentence with "ya know what I mean?"
- After a few hours with him I felt like I knew his entire life story. Bought a horse at 12 without his parents knowing, left school at 14 to work at a butchers. Details were not spared either and if I were to go on Mastermind I would consider choosing his now sold butcher business as my specialist subject (locations: 3, employees: 24, best butcher in Sutherlandshire: him).
- He is strongly opinionated on everything, from IKEA (hates) to fish (loves).
- His trusty Toyota has clocked up almost 500,000 miles.
- His husky travels around with him in the van and at one point I fed it coffee.
And at first I found him insufferable. I was bombarded with more instructions than anyone could remember, all very specific. Then when I got something wrong he was snappy and rude. This didn't make my job easy, neither did his demands to work at a very rapid pace. My first lawn was mowed shoddily and slowly and I wanted the day to end as soon as possible.
However, I soon discovered there was a reason that he was so specific with his methods: they worked. Using as much of his advice as I could recall, my second lawn was cut excellently and quickly. We soon became quite a duo - him with the whipper, me with the mower - we worked well together and flew through the jobs. I liked the work rate and my boss liked my energy, speedy learning, and attitude in general and had gone from "you ****ing idiot" to "it's been ****ing great working with you mate!". My tone had changed too. Once I got used to his ways I grew to like him. He is mad as a hatter, but provides pure entertainment in the van and is actually quite friendly and seems to be very popular around the region. On the face of it, the two of us could hardly of been more different, but we agreed on many topics such as hard work and healthy eating. I worked for him Thursday and Saturday (doing another house removal in between) and will be back for another wild ride on Monday.
There were two aspects of my labour days that had become very satisfying. Firstly, I was taking to new tasks like lawn mowing quicker and using skills learned from previous jobs in new ones. For instance, my experience of handling the two wheel trolley while moving furniture enabled me to shift crates and kegs so effectively ay the festival. Secondly, and this especially pleased me, characteristics developed from all the training I have done for tennis and later for no reason were helping me succeed and employers were now consistently asking me back to do more work. My strength, stamina, intensity, energy, and focus were being translated into hard, fast cash. Well, cash anyway.
***
Friday night I went to a show at a small venue in nearby suburb Miranda. After three decent support bands, headline act Jinja Safari took to the stage and played an incredibly fun set. I knew nothing about the band - one hour before the show a German buddy asked me if I wanted to accompany him as he had been given a couple of free tickets by a colleague, and I saw no reason not to say yes. I can't begin to describe the sound of Jinja Safari's music (according to Wikipedia a possible genre for them is 'forest rock' - what is that???), so you'll just have to listen to the song below. What I can tell you is that they were wildly creative, had everyone dancing - even on the stage during the last song - and deployed a multitude of different instruments with devastating effect, including the sitar!
Lastly, massive congratulations to my sister Charlotte and her boyfriend Ed on their engagement! The good news travelled from La Palma, Canary Islands to Cronulla, Australia and made me very happy indeed.
- He could talk the hind legs off a donkey, and then back on again. His chatter is relentless - to me, to customers, to friends, to strangers, and even, on occasion, himself.
- If he had a swear jar, it would need to be the size of the Millenium Dome. The man has an acid tongue. The F word is easily his most used word, despite the fact that he ends almost every sentence with "ya know what I mean?"
- After a few hours with him I felt like I knew his entire life story. Bought a horse at 12 without his parents knowing, left school at 14 to work at a butchers. Details were not spared either and if I were to go on Mastermind I would consider choosing his now sold butcher business as my specialist subject (locations: 3, employees: 24, best butcher in Sutherlandshire: him).
- He is strongly opinionated on everything, from IKEA (hates) to fish (loves).
- His trusty Toyota has clocked up almost 500,000 miles.
- His husky travels around with him in the van and at one point I fed it coffee.
And at first I found him insufferable. I was bombarded with more instructions than anyone could remember, all very specific. Then when I got something wrong he was snappy and rude. This didn't make my job easy, neither did his demands to work at a very rapid pace. My first lawn was mowed shoddily and slowly and I wanted the day to end as soon as possible.
However, I soon discovered there was a reason that he was so specific with his methods: they worked. Using as much of his advice as I could recall, my second lawn was cut excellently and quickly. We soon became quite a duo - him with the whipper, me with the mower - we worked well together and flew through the jobs. I liked the work rate and my boss liked my energy, speedy learning, and attitude in general and had gone from "you ****ing idiot" to "it's been ****ing great working with you mate!". My tone had changed too. Once I got used to his ways I grew to like him. He is mad as a hatter, but provides pure entertainment in the van and is actually quite friendly and seems to be very popular around the region. On the face of it, the two of us could hardly of been more different, but we agreed on many topics such as hard work and healthy eating. I worked for him Thursday and Saturday (doing another house removal in between) and will be back for another wild ride on Monday.
There were two aspects of my labour days that had become very satisfying. Firstly, I was taking to new tasks like lawn mowing quicker and using skills learned from previous jobs in new ones. For instance, my experience of handling the two wheel trolley while moving furniture enabled me to shift crates and kegs so effectively ay the festival. Secondly, and this especially pleased me, characteristics developed from all the training I have done for tennis and later for no reason were helping me succeed and employers were now consistently asking me back to do more work. My strength, stamina, intensity, energy, and focus were being translated into hard, fast cash. Well, cash anyway.
***
Friday night I went to a show at a small venue in nearby suburb Miranda. After three decent support bands, headline act Jinja Safari took to the stage and played an incredibly fun set. I knew nothing about the band - one hour before the show a German buddy asked me if I wanted to accompany him as he had been given a couple of free tickets by a colleague, and I saw no reason not to say yes. I can't begin to describe the sound of Jinja Safari's music (according to Wikipedia a possible genre for them is 'forest rock' - what is that???), so you'll just have to listen to the song below. What I can tell you is that they were wildly creative, had everyone dancing - even on the stage during the last song - and deployed a multitude of different instruments with devastating effect, including the sitar!
Lastly, massive congratulations to my sister Charlotte and her boyfriend Ed on their engagement! The good news travelled from La Palma, Canary Islands to Cronulla, Australia and made me very happy indeed.
Wednesday, 1 January 2014
New Year's Eve in Sydney
New Year's Eve fireworks displays don't come any more famous than Sydney's and in the run up there was no shortage of hype. People were contemplating getting there at noon, there was a sense that there was no better place in the world to be, and phrases like "once in a lifetime" were being banded around the hostel. Thousands upon thousands of tourists and travellers were ready to be able to say "I was there for 2014" and we were stoked to be amongst them.
But would it live up to the hype? So often a big build up seems to lead to a bigger disappointment. Indeed, after I finished work the day became increasingly frustrating. The problem was that the group from the hostel was just far too large to coordinate or make any progress. Getting out the hostel was the initial challenge, as we were always waiting for one more person to be ready. A group of eight (4 Italians, 2 French, 1 German, myself) eventually managed to escape to the train station, but half the gang were forced to alight before our destination due to bursting bladders. Therefore we had to wait at the Sydney station for the next two Cronulla trains to arrive - one containing the toilet foursome (which arrived without the German) and the next carrying the rest of the hostel group. Of course given that eight people couldn't last a direct one hour train journey without separating, a squadron of twenty had no chance of sticking together in a crowded Sydney. Yet people wanted to try and predictably it was a disaster. Meeting places were confused, different opinions on where to go were vented, some guys couldn't get into certain areas because they had alcohol, stoppages were made by individuals for McDonalds, photographs, and flashing devil ears, one faction were holed up in a bar, and with just 15 minutes to go until the 9 o'clock fireworks we were just standing around uselessly. It wasn't a good advert for the EU. Our group wanted to watch the fireworks from the best spot with alcohol and all of their friends, which simply wasn't going to happen. I decided enough was enough and disbanded with a friendly British guy to watch the early pyrotechnics in Darling Harbour.
From then on, the night was magical. The 9 o'clock 'family' fireworks were a great support act and special in their own right, lighting up the magnificent Darling Harbour. We then made our way towards Sydney Harbour Bridge for the midnight display and although the city was teeming with people, it wasn't suffocating. Actually, it was fun to be among so many people, all eagerly anticipating the arrival of the New Year. The Circular Quay area which contains the Opera House was full, so we headed up to Observation Park where we amazingly stumbled upon a group from the hostel! Taking a seat on the hill with a great view, we were happy to be where we were and with the people we were with.
The wait for midnight passed quickly and with minutes to go we manoeuvred ourselves into a prime position with no sight of the Opera House, but uninterrupted views of the Harbour and its famous bridge. The fireworks were breathtaking. From our vantage point, we could see displays going off simultaneously from about five different locations, including from the Bridge. It was hard to know where to look. At one point, golden lights descended spectacularly from the underside of the Bridge, while colourful rockets peppered the night sky above. The whole show lasted around 15 minutes and the finale was customarily grand. It was of course the greatest fireworks display I had ever seen, but it was also surreal to actually be there and it installed a sense of optimism for the year ahead. It lived up to the hype. I was there for 2014.
But would it live up to the hype? So often a big build up seems to lead to a bigger disappointment. Indeed, after I finished work the day became increasingly frustrating. The problem was that the group from the hostel was just far too large to coordinate or make any progress. Getting out the hostel was the initial challenge, as we were always waiting for one more person to be ready. A group of eight (4 Italians, 2 French, 1 German, myself) eventually managed to escape to the train station, but half the gang were forced to alight before our destination due to bursting bladders. Therefore we had to wait at the Sydney station for the next two Cronulla trains to arrive - one containing the toilet foursome (which arrived without the German) and the next carrying the rest of the hostel group. Of course given that eight people couldn't last a direct one hour train journey without separating, a squadron of twenty had no chance of sticking together in a crowded Sydney. Yet people wanted to try and predictably it was a disaster. Meeting places were confused, different opinions on where to go were vented, some guys couldn't get into certain areas because they had alcohol, stoppages were made by individuals for McDonalds, photographs, and flashing devil ears, one faction were holed up in a bar, and with just 15 minutes to go until the 9 o'clock fireworks we were just standing around uselessly. It wasn't a good advert for the EU. Our group wanted to watch the fireworks from the best spot with alcohol and all of their friends, which simply wasn't going to happen. I decided enough was enough and disbanded with a friendly British guy to watch the early pyrotechnics in Darling Harbour.
From then on, the night was magical. The 9 o'clock 'family' fireworks were a great support act and special in their own right, lighting up the magnificent Darling Harbour. We then made our way towards Sydney Harbour Bridge for the midnight display and although the city was teeming with people, it wasn't suffocating. Actually, it was fun to be among so many people, all eagerly anticipating the arrival of the New Year. The Circular Quay area which contains the Opera House was full, so we headed up to Observation Park where we amazingly stumbled upon a group from the hostel! Taking a seat on the hill with a great view, we were happy to be where we were and with the people we were with.
The wait for midnight passed quickly and with minutes to go we manoeuvred ourselves into a prime position with no sight of the Opera House, but uninterrupted views of the Harbour and its famous bridge. The fireworks were breathtaking. From our vantage point, we could see displays going off simultaneously from about five different locations, including from the Bridge. It was hard to know where to look. At one point, golden lights descended spectacularly from the underside of the Bridge, while colourful rockets peppered the night sky above. The whole show lasted around 15 minutes and the finale was customarily grand. It was of course the greatest fireworks display I had ever seen, but it was also surreal to actually be there and it installed a sense of optimism for the year ahead. It lived up to the hype. I was there for 2014.
| Sydney Harbour Bridge fireworks |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)